Archive for the ‘Election’ Category

Don’t pick up ‘rubbish’ from Sarawak

Monday, September 6th, 2010

Datuk Seri with Francis Siah of MoCS

Pakatan Rakyat supremo Anwar Ibrahim has been advised to keep his distance from certain politically shady characters in Sarawak who seem to have become his advisers on Sarawak affairs in recent months.

“Some of them have wriggled their way back to Anwar after they were discarded by Sarawak BN leaders. These are people whom Anwar should be wary of,” Movement for Change, Sarawak (MoCS) leader Francis Paul Siah said in a statement here Monday.

He said MoCS has received reports of uneasiness from several PKR leaders in Sarawak who fear that Anwar would be taken for a ride by some of his self-proclaimed advisers in the state.

“They are worried that these ‘advisers’ would create dissent within the ranks of PKR and Pakatan Rakyat in the coming state election. MoCS is concerned with this development as these ‘BN discards’ could disrupt the changes advocated by the movement for Sarawak,” said Siah.

As such, MoCS has to caution Anwar to stay clear from these people whose only possible intention to be aligned with the PKR adviser is to reap the rewards from a future Pakatan government, he said.

“These people are political parasites and they must not be given any role in Sarawak politics at all. At the drop of a hat, these parasites will dump political allegiance to go and chase the filthy lucre of politics wherever it can be found. We should be able to pre-empt their ulterior motives,” Siah cautioned.

“They are ‘rubbish’ from Sarawak which Anwar should not pick up,” he added.

The MoCS leader referred to two incidents which Anwar did not perform as well as expected of his iconic status as a national leader.

One was a by-election in Sarawak last year in which PKR took on the BN. The candidate Anwar eventually endorsed was the result of a recommendation from one of his so-called ‘advisers’ of questionable character.

It is believed that Anwar’s decision did not go down well with the majority of PKR people in Sarawak as they felt that another candidate was a better choice. As a result, it was a divided PKR that entered the fray and not surprisingly, the party was defeated.

“As PKR licked its wounds after the by-election defeat, Anwar has to shoulder the blame for the electoral disaster,” Siah said.

A second incident was Anwar’s recent trip to London where another of his Sarawak ‘adviser’ tagged along.

“And in the UK, all that the guy did was to complain and sigh to others about his timber licence being cancelled. With the opportunity to meet an audience overseas, shouldn’t he be talking about a new political direction for Sarawak and what role he could play in that quest? Anwar should be embarrassed to have such an adviser in his camp,” said Siah.

Yet another report received by MoCS was of one Anwar ‘adviser’ who bad-mouthed the PKR chief after he was unsuccessful in obtaining business contracts from Selangor Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahim.

“Anwar should realize that some people hang around him only hoping for some lucrative deals from the Selangor Government or in states where he has influence. Once it became known that they could not get what they wanted, they would not hesitate to unleash venom from their forked tongues against Anwar and PKR.”

Siah also revealed a purported plan by one of the shady characters to allow him to select PKR candidates for the coming Sarawak elections with the undertaking that he would fund these candidates.

“This is something serious and MoCS would like to warn Anwar that if he (Anwar) allows the perverted attempt to succeed, we will request Sarawak voters to reject such PKR candidates. Party candidates must not be subservient to a godfather whose only desire is to continue the plunder of Sarawak resources via lucrative under-the-table deals,” he said.

“It is unfortunate that Anwar has surrounded himself with characters who strut around in their self deluded image of themselves as demigods that have done the hapless people a favour by condescending to listen to their tales of thirst and hunger. At best, these people are only bluffing themselves but they would not get their way around the people of Sarawak much longer. MoCS will do its utmost to halt the undesirable activities of these parasites”.

Siah said there are several genuine and upright leaders in Sarawak PKR and Anwar should ensure that their voices are not drowned in the cacophony of political sycophants who believe that there is no better way to survive than to live off peanuts from them (“political parasites”) who themselves are feeding fat on the  sweat and tears of Sarawakians.

The MoCS leader urged Anwar to accept the movement’s feedback in good faith as it was the result of reports from his own party leaders and members in Sarawak. He said that MoCS would accord Anwar due respect in his position as the Parliamentary Opposition Leader.

Siah said it was a fact that PKR leaders in Sarawak may feel uncomfortable to inform Anwar of unpleasant things as he was their boss but “I will not hesitate to let him know what is wrong as I am not a PKR member and Anwar is not my boss”.

“In fact, MoCS will ‘raise its voice’ against political leaders whether they are from Barisan Nasional or Pakatan Rakyat if they digress from doing the right thing for Sarawak and its people.”

“It is the responsibility of MoCS to do so,” Siah added.

Malaysian Mirror

A tale of two states (and two men)

Thursday, September 2nd, 2010

One is corrupt and live a flamboyant life style, while the other lead a simple life style.

The following is a very well written article and we hope some one can direct Infrastructure Development and Communication Minister, Michael Manyin to read it.

All Bidayuh supporters of UMNO-PBB-Sarawak Barisan Nasional should now realise, who Michael Manyin is and how for the past few months he has been blackmailing the Dayak Community, besides shooting himselves on his foot base on the argument in the following article which appeared in Malaysian Mirror.

Public Scoundrel in Sarawak, Abdul Taib Mahmud and Tok Guru Nik Aziz the Revered and Well Loved Mentri Besar of Kelantan. Even UMNO supporters loves him.

On 30 August, the state of Kelantan sued the national oil corporation Petronas, for alleged breach of a contract that had been signed between Kelantan and Petronas, in 1975. With Kelantan deprived of oil royalties, its people were robbed of the benefits that could have improved their lives.

If this is the federal government’s way of punishing the Kelantan people for voting PAS at the state level, then BN is defeated even before it has begun. Isn’t BN bothered that it is also punishing its own supporters in Kelantan?

The federal government treats Petronas like its personal kitty – a cash cow with which it can dip its grubby paws into, to reward those states which are compliant. The federal government is acting irresponsibly, by being spiteful and therefore, is unfit to govern.

Kelantan (population 2,100,000) is the poorest state; Sarawak (2,500,000) is the next poorest. Both Sarawak and Kelantan are blessed with oil reserves and timber, but they remain poor. Their poverty is because of different reasons.

Sarawak’s abundance of liquefied petroleum gas and petroleum is the mainstay of the Federal government’s economy and yet it receives only 5% royalty. Its state sanctioned logging and oil-palm industries, has resulted in massive deforestation. Only 5% of virgin jungle remains.

Despite the relative economic growth from timber, oil palm and oil, Sarawak still lags markedly behind the rest of the other states, bar Kelantan.

These two states have in common, elderly leaders who have been at the helm for decades: Taib Mahmud led Sarawak for 30 years whilst Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat served Kelantan since 1990.

But the two men, who are in their seventies, are like chalk and cheese. Taib belongs to BN whereas Nik Aziz is with PAS.

Apparently, after filing the suit against Petronas, Kelantan menteri besar Nik Aziz led 200 supporters in a solat hajat (prayer of need) at the nearby Federal Territory Mosque. Nik Aziz is famed for commanding support from non-Muslims in Malaysia and is instrumental in playing a leading role for the increase in popularity of PAS among non-Muslims.

However, the only recent suit we remember involving Taib Mahmud was the white one he wore (complete with red bow tie) on the night of the glittering high society banquet of the Islamic Fashion Festival (IFF) Charity Gala Dinner in Monaco-Monte Carlo.

Together with various members of Malaysian royalty and 600 guests from Monaco’s high society, Taib watched as Malaysia’s “First Lady” Rosmah Mansor, the IFF patron, donated 270,000 euros (RM1,120,961) to the Prince Albert II Foundation of Monaco. The money had been raised from the promotion of Sarawak tourism, and an auction of items including a framed signed photo of Prince Albert

Tok Guru, as Nik Aziz, is affectionately called, commands huge respect from several people. He interacts well with non-Muslims, because they admire him for his honesty, views on moral issues and his candour.

They may not agree with all of his policies, but he is valued for his wisdom and his courage. How many in the Umno camp can match up to Tok Guru?

Taib Mahmud on the other hand, raised the ire of many, including a group of foreigners who joined a protest in Oxford when he went to the United Kingdom to woo investors with the ‘Sarawak Corridor of Renewable Energy’ (SCORE).

They were protesting at the destruction of the rainforests of Sarawak, the denial of justice for the Penan and also the construction of the 12 mega-dams project which will displace the indigenous people living in the affected areas.

The contrast between the two men continues on a personal level.

Nik Aziz lives in a modest wooden house which has no elaborate fencing, no ornate gate with security features and no sentries. His has been known to carry and use the same BIC ballpoint pen and travels in the official Proton Perdana, official registration number DBA 8668.

Home for Taib Mahmud is a grand riverside mansion overlooking the Sarawak River, stuffed with gilt-edged ‘Louis-Farouk’ style furniture. He, and his son, own a fleet of luxury cars including a Rolls Royce.

Taib has no need for car registration-number plates – those are for ordinary folk. His official car is a Mercedes 600 SEL which has no number plates, only a ‘YAB KETUA MENTERI SARAWAK’. His travelling needs would not be complete without the helicopters and a jet belonging to Hornbill Airways, specifically for his use.

Back in Kelantan, Nik Aziz’s religious background is complete with a religious school owned by his family, but Taib Mahmud’s greed, knows no boundaries.

He and his family own various multimillion properties and companies in Sarawak, the USA, the UK, Canada and Australia. These were allegedly built from the proceeds of the lucrative business deals exploiting Sarawak’s natural resources.

Awangku Jinal Pengiran Jawa, the PBB Youth leader said last week, that they would “vigorously oppose” any attempt to pressure Taib Mahmud to retire and that the ‘provocations and pressure’ on Taib should stop. He also questioned why people were picking on Taib when ‘other old leaders and poverty in places such as Kelantan were never questioned by certain quarters’.

Many people have, only he was not listening.

Of the two poorest states in Malaysia, one receives oil royalties, the other does not. But whilst the Chief Minister of Sarawak manages to lead a life that is way beyond his official ***RM13,000 salary and is alleged to have built a multi-million fortune and stashed it abroad, the Menteri Besar of Kelantan lives a modest life, one that speaks volumes of the man.

Nik Aziz, the spiritual leader of PAS, does not receive any oil royalty. Taib Mahmud who belongs to BN, does.

Are Malaysians, principally the Sarawak people, content to gawp at the opulence and grand lifestyle of Taib Mahmud? Are they happy with the breach of trust?

Taib Mahmud is a perfect example that the route to wealth in Sarawak, (and Malaysia) is by entering politics and remaining subservient to those at the ‘peak’, unless one is at the ‘peak’, as Taib is.

Sadly, when they’re there, they can be a law unto themselves.

Marian Mokhtar @ Malaysian Mirror

Merdeka Holiday’s entertainment!

Monday, August 30th, 2010

MACC Lawyer Abdul Razak Musa clowning in Court

In other countries the best brains, especially in law (judiciary) and economics work for the government.

In Malaysia, after watching the inquest and DPP Abdul Razak Musa (MACC’s lawyer) questioning Dr Pornthip, you decide whether in Malaysia, the government attract the best brains to serve or otherwise.

Since the hilarious questioning by DPP Abdul Razak Musa and Dr Pornthip’s testimony, the news, transcripts and video have been much sought after with searches coming in via google and from around the world. Overnight, DPP Abdul Razak Musa have become a celebrity, but for the wrong reason.

This has added another feather to MACC’s cap and illustrious reputation.

If justice must be seen to be delivered, DPP Abdul Razak Musa certainly have added a more charismatic twist to it with his near comical line of questioning to convince the Coroner that Dr Pornthip is not credible. Will he succeed? Remember we are in Boleh Land!

As it is Merdeka Holidays and to keep yourself entertained, why not we upload the full length video in 7 parts for Malaysians and our Visitors to enjoy.

If MACC and DPP Abdul Razak Musa have not brough shame to the Malaysian Government, we certainly felt the embarassement on behalf of the Malaysian Government.

In the last video, was it an “ash tray” or an “x-ray” he is holding. We heard him say “ash tray”.

Wondering where he got his law degree and certainly, if Dr Pornthip’s degree is not recognised, DPP Abdul Razak Musa’s degree is certainly only fit to qualify him as an office boy in a legal firm in Thailand.

The Courts have decided .. this is what Utusan Melayu, The Star, Malay Mail will scream when the verdit is delivered (anticipated) soon.

Justice must be seen to be delivered and this may not be the case here.

Watch the the 7 part video here. Millions of netizens have watched it. Have you?

Stand up and be counted, Malaysia

Sunday, August 29th, 2010

It is strange that in the 21st century, we are still having to face the problem of institutionalised racism.

OVER the past week or so, there have been some developments in our country which are more disturbing than usual.

In particular, the two cases of alleged racist remarks by school heads; the accusations that Penang mosques have replaced the Yang di-Pertuan Agong with the Chief Minister’s name in their prayers; and the continued insistence that Article 153 of the Constitution is equal to an inalienable right that could not be questioned.

These events are interrelated and it seems to me that they indicate that there is a battle of ideology going on in the country now.

On one side is the idea that a person’s ethnicity and religion entitles him to be treated better than anyone else who is different. On the other side is the idea that equality is an aspiration that is both noble and necessary for nation building.

It is strange that in the 21st century we are still having to face the problem of institutionalised racism.

Looking at our history, one can see why this has occurred. The combination of race-based politics and poorly interpreted constitutional provisions have meant that the idea of racial and religious superiority has been allowed to grow and become the norm rather than something undesirable and out of the ordinary.

How else can one explain the possibility that teachers, the very people to whom we entrust the education of our children, can have such warped values and also have the gall to express those views publicly?

How else can we explain the near rabid attack on the Penang Chief Minister for something which he and the state religious department have vehemently denied and in fact would have been insane to attempt?

Let’s analyse this one step at a time. When the dominant political parties in this country do not have any political ideology to speak of and are instead, based on the principle that each race-based component has a duty to safeguard the interest of its community, what one has is a recipe for the kind of policy and rhetoric that divides rather than unites.

Historically, one can see the reasons why the politics of the nation was forged in this way. It was a necessary evil in the face of the divide-and-rule policy by the British to show that even when separate, the three major communities of the nation can still work together politically.

However, it is an unsustainable model and what started life as a fairly rosy example of racial cooperation too easily descended into crude racialist type politics.

Which is why the early aspirations that our founding fathers had for a society treated with equality has now been all but buried by the idea that one race is superior to others and in fact is the only race with any right to be here in Malaysia.

This is because in the battlefields of politics, it is easiest to appeal to base racialist emotions, especially when without those types of ideas, a party based on race will have no collateral to work with.

In this kind of political atmosphere, it is of no surprise that what has been forgotten is that the basis of this nation was one of justice and equality. And the document that is meant to protect that, the Federal Constitution, has been misinterpreted to the extent that there is no longer any trace of this aspiration in the mainstream discourse of the day.

Let us be absolutely clear on this matter, the Constitution does give powers to the government to take affirmative action and it does acknowledge the fact that Islam has a special place in the public life of the nation.

What it does not intend to do however is create a perpetual system of ethnic-based favourable treatment nor does it advocate the idea that all other religious beliefs must be subservient to Islam.

However, instead of this reasonable position, what we have today is the idea that affirmative action for Malays is unquestionable and to be continued in perpetuity becoming the norm.

This cannot be further from the truth as there are no legal justification for it at all.

Article 153 of the Federal Constitution is seen as the holy grail for those who hold this view. However, if we examine the provision closely we will notice two things.

Firstly, affirmative action is not a Malay right. Article 153 does not endow a right. What it does is to merely give government the power to take affirmative action despite the overarching ideal of equality which is enshrined in Article 8 of the Constitution.

To support this contention, we see that Article 8 clearly states that all citizens in this country are equal except for situations specifically provided for in the Constitution. Those “specific provisions” are found in Article 153 and there are not many of them.

They include the power to establish quotas for the civil service, permits and licences, scholarships and education.

Therefore anything other than these areas should not be subjected to affirmative action.

Furthermore, any affirmative action has to be reasonable. The idea of what is reasonable must surely be open to research and debate otherwise there will always be the risk of abuse and wastage of resources.

This being the case, although questioning the existence of such a power to have affirmative action is moot, discussion on the efficacy of affirmative action policies and programmes surely is not.

The way the discourse is today, and not merely by the racialist fringe but by mainstream politicians in power, is that even the implementation of Article 153 is not to be questioned at all.

This is surely wrong based both on the meaning of the Constitution as well as the principle held by the founding fathers that Article 153 was an unfortunate but necessary aberration from the ideals of equality and that it was to be used not in perpetuity.

With these kinds of distortion of law, is it any wonder then that we still get people actually classifying whole swathes of the citizenry as having no right to be here?

Is it any wonder then that a crazy accusation against a Chief Minister whose government has given twice as much money to the Islamic bodies in the state than the previous administration, can give rise to the belief that he is a threat to the faith?

If this country is to have any future as a true nation, the time has come for those who believe in the ideals of equality, ideals which were held by the political founding fathers of the country as well as the traditional Rulers of that time, to stand up and be counted.

To not be cowed by the bigots and to say that this is our country and it stands on noble humanitarian ideals, not opportunistic racialist thinking.

BRAVE NEW WORLD By AZMI SHAROM

Related Article – Why I stand up?

Why I stand up?

Saturday, August 28th, 2010

Keith Olbermann Special Comment:
There Is No ‘Ground Zero Mosque’